Revealed: Trump and Netanyahu’s Secret Plan to Strike Iran

A bombshell report released on Wednesday has revealed that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump secretly coordinated a potential military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities as early as February 2025, while publicly feigning diplomatic friction to deceive Tehran. 
According to The Washington Post, the clandestine planning began during Netanyahu’s first visit to the White House following Trump’s inauguration. During this meeting, Netanyahu reportedly presented the President with four distinct military options: a unilateral Israeli strike, an Israeli-led operation with limited U.S. support, full collaboration, and a U.S.-led assault. While Trump publicly championed a renewed push for “nuclear diplomacy,” privately, he and Netanyahu agreed that “if talks fail, we are ready to go”. 
The investigation exposes a sophisticated “deception campaign” designed to lull the Iranian leadership into a false sense of security. For months, leaks from both Washington and Jerusalem painted a picture of a strained relationship, with reports of Trump being frustrated by Israeli intransigence. These narratives, now understood to be deliberate disinformation, were intended to convince Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei that the U.S. would not support an Israeli attack, thereby lowering Tehran’s defensive posture. “It was good that this was the general perception,” a senior Israeli official admitted, confirming the ruse was a strategic asset. 
While the world focused on the “tensions,” covert preparations accelerated. The report details “Operation Narnia,” a ruthless shadow campaign launched in early 2025, during which Israeli operatives assassinated 11 senior Iranian nuclear scientists to degrade the regime’s technical capabilities before the kinetic phase of the war. Simultaneously, the Mossad reportedly armed over 100 agents within Iran, some trained on Israeli soil, with specific missions to disable key infrastructure at the moment of the strike. 
The revelation reframes the narrative of the conflict that erupted later in the year. Far from being a spontaneous escalation or a unilateral Israeli move that dragged the U.S. into war—as some critics suggested—the joint operations were the culmination of a months-long, synchronized strategy. The “diplomatic failure” that ostensibly triggered the June strikes appears to have been a pre-calculated trigger point in a timeline agreed upon by both leaders well in advance. 
As the dust settles on the year’s geopolitical upheavals, this exposure of the Trump-Netanyahu playbook offers a stark lesson in statecraft: in the high-stakes game of nuclear proliferation, the loudest public disagreements may serve only to mask the quietest, deadliest agreements.