Former U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday his intention to repurpose the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, typically reserved for terrorism suspects, to house up to 30,000 undocumented migrants. His plan marks a controversial escalation in immigration enforcement, stirring significant backlash from human rights advocates and legal experts.
“I will be signing an executive order today directing the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security to prepare a detention facility in Guantanamo Bay capable of holding 30,000 migrants,” Trump stated. He characterized the targeted detainees as undocumented individuals with criminal records, signaling a hardline approach in dealing with what he described as a crisis of “illegal migration.”
This announcement coincided with Trump’s signing of his first piece of legislation since his return to office, a strict anti-immigration law authorizing the automatic detention of undocumented individuals charged or convicted of specific crimes.
The Guantanamo Bay detention center, established in 2002 within the confines of a U.S. military base in Cuba, originally served as part of the global “war on terror” launched by President George W. Bush following the September 11, 2001, attacks. The prison has since housed hundreds of detainees, including high-profile members of al-Qaeda. Over the years, it has become a lightning rod for criticism due to harsh detention conditions and allegations of torture.
Efforts by previous Democratic administrations to close Guantanamo have repeatedly failed. Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden both pledged to shutter the facility during their respective tenures, but neither achieved the goal, largely due to political and legal obstacles.
Reports indicate that Guantanamo has been used intermittently over the years for purposes beyond detaining terrorism suspects. In September, The New York Times obtained government documents revealing that the U.S. had used the base for decades to detain migrants intercepted at sea. According to the report, migrants held at Guantanamo were separated from terrorism-related detainees, but conditions within the camp have remained a subject of controversy.
Several advocacy groups have condemned the treatment of migrants at Guantanamo, pointing to testimony from former detainees and legal representatives. Allegations include restricted attorney access, invasive monitoring of legal communications, the forced use of blackout goggles during transfers, and unsanitary living conditions that attract rodents and pose health risks.
Trump’s renewed immigration crackdown aligns with the hardline rhetoric he championed during his 2016 presidential campaign, in which he promised to end what he termed the “invasion” of undocumented migrants. His administration has since reinstated and expanded numerous immigration enforcement measures, including the expedited deportation of those deemed to be living in the U.S. illegally.
Currently, an estimated 11 million undocumented individuals reside within the United States. The Trump administration has prioritized accelerating deportations and limiting asylum access, arguing that stricter enforcement is necessary to uphold national security and economic stability. However, critics argue that Trump’s policies risk violating international human rights standards, particularly with his plan to use Guantanamo as a large-scale detention center.
Human rights organizations have already signaled plans to challenge Trump’s latest executive order in court. They contend that using a facility infamous for its human rights abuses as a holding center for migrants undermines the principles of due process and humanitarian treatment. Some legal experts warn that the move could set a dangerous precedent, effectively criminalizing migration and eroding protections for vulnerable populations seeking refuge in the U.S.
As Trump’s administration continues its push to curb immigration, political opposition within Congress and legal battles in federal courts are expected to intensify. Democrats have pledged to fight the policy shift, while immigrant rights groups are mobilizing protests and campaigns to highlight what they describe as inhumane detention practices.
With Guantanamo’s future once again at the center of a heated national debate, the coming months will reveal whether Trump’s controversial policies can withstand judicial and political scrutiny, or if they will be curtailed by the courts and legislative action.
Follow us on:
• YouTube
• Telegram
• TikTok
